english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Vrij Media Centrum Nederland
Indymedia NL is een onafhankelijk lokaal en mondiaal vrij communicatie orgaan. Indymedia biedt een andere kijk op het nieuws door een open publicatie methode van tekst, beeld & geluid.
> contact > zoek > archief > hulp > doe mee > publiceer nieuws > open nieuwslijn > disclaimer > chat
Zoek

 
Alle Woorden
Elk Woord
Bevat Media:
Alleen beelden
Alleen video
Alleen audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI klaagt Indymedia.nl aan
Rechtszaak Deutsche Bahn tegen Indymedia.nl
Onderwerpen
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Hulp
Hulp en tips voor beginners
Een korte inleiding over Indymedia NL
De spelregels van Indymedia NL
Hoe mee te doen?
Doneer
Steun Indymedia NL financieel!
Rechtszaken kosten veel geld, we kunnen elke (euro)cent gebruiken!

Je kunt ook geld overmaken naar bankrekening 94.32.153 tnv Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53).
Indymedia Netwerk

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
Deze site is geproduceerd door vrijwilligers met free software waar mogelijk.

De software die we gebruiken is beschikbaar op: mir.indymedia.de
een alternatief is te vinden op: active.org.au/doc

Dank aan indymedia.de en mir-coders voor het creren en delen van mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
US Justice: US 'Trials' of Pol. Refugee in Europe Fraudulent
Dan Hajidah - 25.02.2009 00:26

US Dept of Justice sources: US 'Trials' of Political Refugee in Europe Were Both Fraudulent - US federal courts used illegally, to ban and slander dissident journalist and blogger Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs - US federal judges send harassing e-mails to Europe over refugee from US court corruption - US judges get European message, shove your e-mails "up the rectum"!

Photo, political refugee from US Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs at EU Parliament
Photo, political refugee from US Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs at EU Parliament

The new United States Attorney General under President Obama, Eric H. Holder Jr, is currently pondering the European request, that he bring criminal charges against the US group who have mounted several years of attacks against the US dissident writer Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, now living as an exile refugee from the US in Europe.

Dr Les Sachs, a US anti-corruption author and journalist, and himself a former award-winning US Department of Justice ('DOJ') employee, was forced to become a political refugee in Europe, after what DOJ sources describe as a scheme of extortion and threats of murder, that were funded by the Bush family friend, political financier, and famous author Patricia Cornwell, and involving some prominent US law firms in specific criminal acts against Sachs.

As described by the DOJ sources, these crimes of extortion and threats of murder - and other elements such as the illegal blocking of Sachs' political websites and blogs from the internet - took place as part of two US federal 'court proceedings' that were conducted in the state of Virginia, USA, where Dr Les Sachs lived before he was forced to escape to Europe.

The second of these two bizarre 'trials' was actually held in absentia, after Dr Les Sachs was already living in Belgium in a secret location, as a political refugee from the US government and judges - so in this second 'proceeding', the US judges merely e-mailed Sachs their new 'court orders' against him, having no address to serve him with any papers.

Sources within the US Dept of Justice itself - who were blocked from prosecuting the multiple crimes against Dr Les Sachs while Bush was President - detail how both of these US federal 'trials' against the dissident journalist Sachs were illegal and fraudulent, and in fact were not 'trials' at all.

According to DOJ staff, it is clear that not only were both of the trials against the refugee Sachs fraudulent and illegal, in fact all the US 'court orders' against Sachs are actually null and void.

These so-called 'trials' generated a series of US federal 'court orders' which imposed multiple bans on Dr Sachs' freedom to write and speak, the blocking of Sachs' European websites so that his sites cannot be found via Google and other search engines.

These US 'court orders' include various other bizarre elements, such as Sachs being supposedly 'required' to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to two friends of US federal Judge Robert Payne, who supervised the first 'trial' against Sachs, and with Judge Payne and his friends all involved in a 'Freedom Foundation' which turns out not to exist.

According to the DOJ sources, the political financier Patricia Cornwell, paid these friends of federal judge Payne to threaten to torture Sachs to death in a US jail cell, and these friends of the judge used the threats of torture and murder to extort money out of Sachs, until Sachs was forced to escape to Europe to save his life.

Significantly, no United States lawyer has ever yet been brave enough, to walk into a US courtroom and file a simple form to have these illegal 'orders' against Dr Les Sachs to be officially nullified, because US lawyers are afraid of speaking about the evidence that US federal judges themselves are participating in criminal acts to have the dissident Sachs murdered. - US lawyers privately express fear of mafia-style revenge by US judges and their cronies.

The fear and cowardice of US lawyers, have frustrated those inside the US Department of Justice, who have long wanted to prosecute the crimes against Sachs, despite the political pressures resulting from Patricia Cornwell's million-dollar gifts to the George Bush family.

These sources at the US Department of Justice detail in specifics how both of the US 'trials' against Dr Les Sachs were fraudulent, and show some of the proof documents which make clear that both of these trials were fraudulent and illegal.

Some of these specific proof documents from US Department of Justice files, and US court and European police files, are already scanned and online at the website, 'Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents', which can be found here:

 http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/

Just below are the details of internal US Department of Justice notes, as to why both of the United States federal court 'trials' against the dissident writer Dr Les Sachs are illegal and fraudulent, and why all the US 'court orders' against Sachs are actually null and void.


For general background on the history of the US government attacks on the dissident Sachs, and about the Patricia Cornwell - Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs legal cases, see the following, which provide accurate facts, in contrast to various false US media pieces, false Wikipedia articles, and even articles by dishonest US law professors, which have been publishing lies and hoaxes in order to hide the crimes of the US judges. Accurate journalism about these cases can be found here:


Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les Sachs

 http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581 - also at:  http://mytinyurl.net/10e98


US Blocking Belgian Journalism Websites to Help Murder US Dissident in Brussels

 http://www.indymedia.be/en/node/31259 - also at:  http://mytinyurl.net/f35b4e


The attacks on the Jewish-heritage Dr Les Sachs, involve racist and anti-Semitic elements tied to Sachs' personal Jewish heritage. Sachs is non-Zionist, so 'Jewish leaders' leave Sachs abandoned, and remain in silence about the threats to have Sachs murdered.

Most centrally, the attacks on Sachs involve direct US government repression to silence Sachs' journalism, to shut down his blogs and block his writings from internet search results, and also the spread of media lies and hoaxes to destroy Sachs' reputation.

The US federal judges themselves have written long dishonest essays telling lies about Sachs and making personal insulting attacks on him, while ordering Google and other search engines to block Sachs' own European websites, in order to hide Sachs' responses to the lies by US judges.

Unable to have personal control over the refugee Sachs in his new home in Europe, the US judges exercise their hatred for Sachs by conducting a propaganda war against him, and trying to control the internet so that Sachs cannot make any statements to defend himself or to help protect his own life.

The blocking of Dr Les Sachs' European websites from worldwide internet search engines, helping to further the US threats to have Sachs murdered, is viewed by lawyers as a serious US violation of international laws and treaties. Sachs' main European website, though blocked, still exists at www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be - Note: Do not put this site as a direct web page link, as any web page listing it may be blocked from internet search results.


US Dept of Justice sources: Why both 'trials' against the refugee dissident Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs are fraudulent, why all the US 'court orders' against Sachs are illegal, null and void

Following are the contents of internal US Department of Justice notes, as to why both of the US 'legal proceedings' against Sachs, and all their 'court orders' are completely invalid. These notes make reference to proof documents that are also held within the US Department of Justice, as well as European police files - And some of these documents are already scanned and online at the site, 'Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents', which can be found here:

 http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/

As these notes of the US Department of Justice are presented, readers who wish to view the original documents and further analysis can consult the above-linked site.

No less than twelve separate reasons are listed, as to why both of the US 'legal proceedings' of Patricia Cornwell and the US judges and government, against the journalist Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, are fraudulent and invalid. Here is just the list, with full details for each of these, and links to proof documents, given below.

(1) Right near the beginning of her attacks on him, Patricia Cornwell committed clear felony perjury against Sachs on a main central issue, this makes all her proceedings against Sachs null and void.

(2) In the initial 'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against Sachs, Cornwell's lawyers arranged for an instant, completely illegal banning of Dr Les Sachs' freedom to write and speak, by prior collusion between US federal Judge Robert Payne and the Willcox & Savage law firm. This is illegal corruption and court fraud by Judge Robert Payne, and by Cornwell's lawyers at Willcox & Savage, so the whole proceeding is fraudulent, null and void.

(3) Lawyers Thomas H Roberts and Tim Schulte, posing as lawyers for Sachs, were actually working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage, and threatened to have Sachs tortured and murdered. Thus the entire 'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against Sachs is illegal and fraudulent, and the court orders from it null and void.

(4) Thomas Roberts and Tim Schulte, while working for Patricia Cornwell and posing as lawyers for Dr Les Sachs, also claimed to be part of a 'Freedom Foundation' which does not exist, and Judge Robert Payne also spoke as salesman for this 'Freedom Foundation' of his corrupt criminal friend Roberts.

(5) The Patricia Cornwell case lawyer Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts - working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage - himself committed multiple felonies of perjury while testifying as to the facts of the Patricia Cornwell case.

(6) There was no actual 'trial' in the first Patricia Cornwell legal case against Sachs which ended a few weeks after it started, with the announcement of a so-called 'settlement', which is clearly a complete fraud. The claim is that, after merely a few weeks of being 'sued by Patricia Cornwell', that somehow, magically and for the great benefit of Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers:
- that Dr Les Sachs 'suddenly' agreed to the permanent banning of his own freedom of speech and freedom of press for the rest of his life;
- that Sachs agreed to have his publishing company and writing career completely destroyed;
- that Sachs agreed to have his own personal reputation destroyed, and not to respond to lies that were published about him;
- that Sachs agreed to a lifelong personal enslavement to Judge Robert Payne, where Sachs could be personally jailed at any time under Judge Payne's whim;
- and that Sachs agreed to spend the rest of his life paying several hundred thousand dollars plus 18 per cent interest, to Judge Payne's personal friend Thomas Roberts, and his partner Tim Schulte, two lawyers with a fraudulent 'Freedom Foundation' who were working for Patricia Cornwell.
This so-called 'settlement' is a clear fraud, utterly impossible, as the successful anti-corruption author Sachs had no assets to lose by a full trial and appeal of illegal 'orders'.

(7) In 2007, the same group of US federal judges in Virginia, the '4th Circuit', who held the first fraudulent proceeding as detailed above, held a second in absentia 'legal proceeding' against Sachs in Belgium, ordering the blocking of Sachs' sites from the internet search engines. This new legal proceeding was premised on 'enforcing' the orders of the first legal proceeding, which has been proven fraudulent as above, thus any proceeding based on that is also fraudulent and illegal, all of its 'court orders' also null and void.

(8) It is clear that it is fraudulent for the US judges to hold a 'legal proceeding' against a victim whom they threaten to illegally jail and murder if he returns to the country to argue his case, and where they are also threatening to disbar or otherwise personally harm any US lawyer who would dare to represent this victim who took refuge in Europe.

(9) For the 2007 'legal proceeding', Sachs was never even served with legal papers. The US judges and lawyers merely resorted to sending Dr Les Sachs their new fraudulent 'court orders' by e-mail.

(10) The 2007 in absentia trial against Sachs, to block his websites and to enable the completion of his murder, was held by the same 4th Circuit US federal judges who are named in a standing Appeal by Sachs as legal parties to the ongoing case.

(11) Dr Les Sachs had already published extensive journalism about corruption by both US 4th Circuit district and Appeals judges, and how these judges are involved in threatening to murder him. These judges must not hold any proceedings about matters in which they are personally involved as objects of the journalism of Dr Les Sachs. They were obligated to have any new case involving Sachs transferred to another Circuit altogether.

(12) The US 2007 'legal proceeding' against Dr Les Sachs, ordering the blocking of his European websites from readers around the world, so that Sachs can be slandered and killed, and the world deprived of reading his political journalism, is a criminal act in direct violation of international treaties both on the subject of terrorism and on open control of the internet.


Now for the full details of the above:


DOJ Notes - Why the 4th Circuit 'Trials' of Sachs with Patricia Cornwell are Illegal Frauds, All 'Court Orders' upon Sachs Null and Void


(1) Right near the beginning of her attacks on him, Patricia Cornwell committed clear felony perjury against Sachs on a main central issue, this makes all her proceedings against Sachs null and void.

Scan of the court transcript page proving the actual act of Patricia Cornwell engaged in felony perjury against Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs:

 http://mytinyurl.net/1


And scans of the extortion letter and court papers about which Patricia Cornwell is lying, that prove she is committing perjury:

 http://mytinyurl.net/bc9c6e

 http://mytinyurl.net/505b1b


(2) In the initial 'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against Sachs, Cornwell's lawyers arranged for an instant and illegal banning of Dr Les Sachs' freedom to write and speak, by prior collusion between US federal Judge Robert Payne and the Willcox & Savage law firm. Apparently there was a successful bribery offer to Payne by Conrad Shumadine of Willcox & Savage. Shumadine was already a friend of 'Judge Robert Payne is my name, Federal bribery is my game.'

Judge Robert Payne was appointed to office by Patricia Cornwell's personal friend of many years, the first US President George Bush, to whose family Cornwell has given millions of dollars.

This illegal ban on Dr Les Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of the press, was imposed by phone call of Judge Payne, a few minutes after Sachs got the legal papers, which Sachs didn't even have time to finish reading. It was farce theatre as well as illegal, carefully timed and arranged by collusion between Judge Robert Payne and Willcox & Savage and the process-servers, who delayed serving the legal papers on Sachs till just before Judge Payne's phone call.

Willcox & Savage had also arranged in advance to publish nationwide media articles attacking and smearing Sachs, and meanwhile Judge Payne had instantly ordered that Sachs faced jail if he dared to respond to the false media. - So lawyers and the public were discouraged from helping Sachs or supporting him, given the lies in the media and on the internet. Sachs was even banned from saying that his freedom of speech had been banned.

Patricia Cornwell's lawyer Shumadine was such a bold liar, that he even used some of the false media articles that he himself had planted, as 'evidence' to support the banning of Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

This is illegal, clear corruption and court fraud by Judge Robert Payne, and by Cornwell's lawyers at Willcox & Savage, so the whole proceeding with Payne is fraudulent, null and void.

For more information on Conrad Shumadine and Willcox & Savage, their relationship with Judge Robert Payne, and their role with Patricia Cornwell in the attacks on Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, see here:

 http://mytinyurl.net/708092


(3) With Dr Les Sachs instantly under threat of jail if he said anything about any crimes against him, Judge Robert Payne and Patricia Cornwell's lawyers at Willcox & Savage, then quickly moved to the next phase of court fraud and extortion.

Judge Payne quickly assigned one of his own personal friends to 'represent' Sachs, a Virginia lawyer named Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts, aided by another lawyer, originally from Germany, and with neo-Nazi and anti-Semitic views, Tim Schulte (occasionally 'Timothy Schulte').

Multiple proofs of fraud and extortion show that Tom Roberts and Tim Schulte were really working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage.

When Sachs realised that Roberts and Schulte were working directly for Cornwell, Roberts and Schulte threatened to have Sachs jailed and tortured to death in jail under Judge Payne's power, if Sachs dared to denounce them or try to 'fire' them.

The threats to have the Jewish Sachs tortured and murdered were apparently a matter of great sadistic pleasure for Patricia Cornwell, and this pleasure was great enough that Cornwell was willing to pay Willcox & Savage several hundred thousand dollars, for the pleasure of extorting a Jew, taking his human rights away, and threatening to torture him to death.

Since the lawyers Roberts and Schulte were actually working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage, and as Roberts and Schulte threatened to have Sachs tortured and murdered, the entire 'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against Sachs is illegal, fraudulent, and the court orders from it null and void.

For Patricia Cornwell's public boasting that she can successfully murder people when she wishes - from Vanity Fair magazine - see here:

 http://mytinyurl.net/7ee992


For court transcript of Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts under oath, talking about murdering Dr Les Sachs, and Roberts' other crimes in the Patricia Cornwell case being exposed, see here:

 http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(4) Thomas H Roberts and Tim Schulte, while working for Patricia Cornwell and posing as lawyers for Dr Les Sachs, also claimed to be part of a 'Freedom Foundation' which does not exist, and Judge Robert Payne also spoke as salesman for this 'Freedom Foundation' of his criminal friend Roberts.

Roberts had spent ten dollars for a corporate name registration for his fake 'foundation', but did no filings with the Internal Revenue Service or state foundation authorities, as required by US law. Yet Roberts has used his fake foundation to obtain money and defraud people, in felony violation of federal statutes. - For their fake 'foundation', Roberts and Schulte have used the name similar to an actual registered Foundation, the 'FreedomWorks Foundation' of billionaire Steve Forbes, though the fake 'Freedom Works Foundation' of Roberts and Schulte and Judge Payne has no connection.

Roberts and Schulte also used the name of law school Dean Rodney 'Rod' Smolla, their former teacher, as also involved in this fraudulent foundation. Smolla is now Dean of Judge Payne's own law school - the circles of Virginia corruption are nicely small.

Under the doctrine of 'fraud upon the court', with Judge Payne and Tom Roberts and Tim Schulte, all claiming that Roberts and Schulte are in a 'Freedom Foundation' that does not exist, and claiming that this 'Foundation' was 'helping' Dr Les Sachs - It is clear that the entire legal proceeding and all 'court orders' from this proceeding are fraudulent, null and void.

Roberts and Judge Payne were so bold in their fraud with their fake 'Freedom Foundation' that they have put this fraud on the internet, in multiple documents, and in court transcript. Here is a court transcript where Thomas Roberts is cornered into essentially acknowledging that his fake 'foundation' is indeed an illegal fraud:

 http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(5) The Patricia Cornwell case lawyer Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts - working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage, though falsely claiming to 'represent' Cornwell's victim Dr Les Sachs - himself committed multiple felonies of perjury while testifying as to the facts of the Patricia Cornwell case.

Under oath and on the witness stand, Tom Roberts committed unmistakable perjury, including perjury claiming he had never seen the Patricia Cornwell extortion letter threatening book-burning against Sachs, even though it is at the centre of the legal files in the original Patricia Cornwell 'legal case'.

Roberts also commits felony perjury about the sticker on Dr Les Sachs' novel, which was about Patricia Cornwell's threats to burn the books of a Jewish author. Instead of the truth, Roberts lies under oath, and tries to spread the Cornwell group's hoax that Sachs' sticker was making 'plagiarism accusations', which in fact were never made by Sachs.

As Thomas H Roberts is proven to be himself a perjurer in his attacks on Sachs, regarding events where he falsely claimed to be 'representing' Sachs in the first legal case with Patricia Cornwell, the Patricia Cornwell legal cases against Sachs are also proven to be fraudulent, null and void, along with the 'court orders' issued against Sachs.

To see the original Patricia Cornwell extortion letter against Sachs, threatening the book-burning of a Jewish man's books, see here:

 http://mytinyurl.net/bc9c6e


To see scans of original Patricia Cornwell US court filings demanding the book-burning of a Jew's books, see here:

 http://mytinyurl.net/505b1b


To see the scan of the official US courthouse copy of the book cover of Dr Les Sachs' novel, with the sticker making reference to Patricia Cornwell's book-burning threats - this scan completely debunking the lie and hoax of media articles, falsely claiming that this book sticker was about 'plagiarism accusations' - see here:

 http://mytinyurl.net/015e6d


To see the official court transcript where the Cornwell case lawyer Thomas H Roberts commits multiple counts of felony perjury, thus proving that the Patricia Cornwell 'legal proceedings' against Dr Les Sachs are fraudulent, null and void, see here:

 http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(6) There was no actual 'trial' in the first Patricia Cornwell legal case against Sachs (and no 'trial' in the second US legal case either). The first 'legal proceeding' ended a few weeks after it started, with the announcement of a so-called 'settlement', which is clearly a complete fraud.

The 'settlement agreement' is not even signed by the victim, Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, but only signed by US federal Judge Robert Payne, and by lawyers who are both working for Patricia Cornwell, Conrad Shumadine and Thomas 'Tom' Roberts.

Previously to being attacked by Patricia Cornwell, Dr Les Sachs had been an anti-corruption author and journalist for many years, as well as a political activist. At the time of these attacks, Sachs had no significant assets, and nothing to lose by a full trial and an appeal of illegal 'court orders'.

Nonetheless, according to this absurdly false 'settlement', the Cornwell lawyers and federal judge, all claim what is literally impossible. They claim that, after merely a few weeks of being 'sued by Patricia Cornwell', that somehow, magically and for the great benefit of Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers:
- that Dr Les Sachs 'suddenly' agreed to the permanent banning of his own freedom of speech and freedom of press for the rest of his life;
- that Sachs agreed to have his publishing company and writing career completely destroyed;
- that Sachs agreed to have his own personal reputation destroyed, and not to respond to lies that were published about him;
- that Sachs agreed to a lifelong personal enslavement to Judge Robert Payne, where Sachs could be personally jailed at any time under Judge Payne's whim;
- and that Sachs agreed to spend the rest of his life paying several hundred thousand dollars plus 18 per cent interest, to Judge Payne's personal friend Thomas Roberts, and his partner Tim Schulte, two lawyers with a fraudulent 'Freedom Foundation' who were working for Patricia Cornwell.

It is literally impossible for Sachs to have 'agreed' to all this, as there is no benefit to him to 'agree' to have his freedom of speech banned and his reputation and publishing company destroyed, and yet pay great sums of money for the rest of his life to Judge Payne's friend Roberts with a fraudulent 'Foundation' that does not exist.

The only thing that explains this fraudulent 'settlement', is what is also evident from the documents and court transcripts, that the extortionists Roberts and Schulte, working for Patricia Cornwell, threatened to have Dr Les Sachs illegally jailed, and tortured to death in a jail cell. That is the only possible basis of this utterly fraudulent 'settlement' benefiting only Patricia Cornwell and the US lawyers and judges.

It is thus clear from the documents and court transcripts, that since the entire so-called 'settlement' of the first Patricia Cornwell legal case is an impossible fraud, consequently the entirety of both of the Patricia Cornwell 'legal proceedings' against Sachs are frauds, with all 'court orders' against Sachs null and void.

Here is a US court transcript where the entire fraudulent settlement scheme of the Cornwell lawyers is exposed, with Cornwell case lawyer Thomas Roberts on the witness stand, and rather well torn apart by a brave Dr Les Sachs, making a last stand inside of the USA, before being forced to escape from America in order to save his life:

 http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(7) In 2007, the same group of US federal judges in Virginia, the '4th Circuit', who held the first fraudulent proceeding as detailed above, held a second in absentia 'legal proceeding' against Sachs in Belgium, where he has been recently living as a political refugee. After his arrival as a refugee in Europe in 2004, Dr Les Sachs became an increasingly influential journalist about US legal corruption, and Sachs' journalistic influence around the world and among US citizens, had come to be seen as a major threat to the US regime.

Moreover, Patricia Cornwell was increasingly angry about the accurate biography of Patricia Cornwell which Dr Les Sachs had published on the web, informing many people about the scandals and sordid details of Patricia Cornwell's past life, details which US corporate media had agreed to hide as a reward for Cornwell's money contributions to the Bushes and other US political figures.

The US federal judges were also increasingly angry at Dr Les Sachs for his journalism on US legal corruption. Perhaps angriest of all was dominant US 4th Circuit Appeals Judge J Harvie Wilkinson III, who missed being appointed to be Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, as a result of an article published by Sachs, right at the very moment when Wilkinson was being interviewed by President Bush for the Supreme Court vacancy.

So Wilkinson and the other 4th Circuit judges, all stung badly by Sachs' anti-corruption journalism, communally resolved to participate in a new scheme to try to have Sachs destroyed and killed, even in his new refugee home in Europe.

The US judges no longer have direct power over Dr Les Sachs, given that he was able to successfully escape alive from US territory. But the CIA and US government and judges, and Patricia Cornwell's own lawyers, they did develop a plan to try to 'finish off' the anti-corruption journalist Sachs, by holding yet another fake and fraudulent 'legal proceeding' inside of America.

So in 2007, the Patricia Cornwell group and the US judges, with the direct involvement as well of the CIA and the President Bush administration, held this second 'legal proceeding' against Sachs, in order to secure a new set of 'court orders' which:
- ordered Google and the major search engines (all US-based) to close down Sachs' political blog, to shut down search engine access to Sachs' political websites and journalism;
- gave Cornwell-linked media companies a new basis to spread lies and slanders against Sachs based on this new 'legal proceeding';
- enabled the completion of the murder of Dr Les Sachs, because the websites by which Sachs was defending and protecting himself, can no longer be found via internet searches, and it is now much easier for US agents or for Patricia Cornwell to finish the murder of Sachs, with search engines hiding the truth about Sachs and how he came to be a refugee in Europe.

This new legal proceeding was premised on 'enforcing' the orders of the first legal proceeding, which has been proven fraudulent as above, and thus any proceeding based on that - such as the 2007 'legal proceeding' ordering the blocking of Sachs' sites from the internet search engines, is also fraudulent and illegal, all of its 'court orders' also null and void.


(8) As seen above, there is clear proof that Dr Les Sachs faced illegal jailing, and torture to death in a jail cell, with the US government being unwilling to protect Sachs from harm. Under President Bush, US authorities refused to prosecute the criminal acts proven here, such as Patricia Cornwell and Thomas Roberts committing clear perjury, and threatening to have Sachs tortured to death in a jail cell.

See here for the exposure of Thomas Roberts' crimes in fraudulently posing as the lawyer for Dr Les Sachs while threatening to murder him:

 http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


Also, it is very clear from thousands of e-mails in the evidence files, that US lawyers have feared mafia-style revenge from US judges, if they dare to represent Dr Les Sachs, or file any US legal papers regarding the criminal acts done against him.

Some of these e-mails are from US lawyers who were immediately disbarred (i.e., lost their right to practice law, by order of the judges), after those lawyers had tried to speak out against US legal corruption. These witnesses confirm that US lawyers are indeed under mafia-style threat and menace, if they dare to represent a client like Dr Les Sachs.

It is clear that it is fraudulent for the US judges to hold a 'legal proceeding' against a victim whom they threaten to illegally jail and murder if he returns to the country to argue his case, and where they are also threatening to disbar or otherwise personally harm any US lawyer who would dare to represent this victim who took refuge in Europe.

Thus, with the 2007 'trial' held in absentia against Dr Les Sachs while he was living as a refugee in Belgium, it is clear that this 'legal proceeding' is illegal and fraudulent, all its orders null and void.


(9) For the 2007 'legal proceeding', Sachs was never even served with legal papers. The US judges and lawyers have no address for Sachs, and Sachs now lives under security at secret locations in Belgium. The US judges and lawyers merely resorted to sending Dr Les Sachs their new fraudulent 'court orders' by e-mail, with Sachs continually responding that these e-mails were criminal harassment.

It is noteworthy that the e-mails from the US judges taunting Sachs, with how they were blocking his websites from the internet to help murder him, came right from the official US courthouse e-mail accounts.

To the harassing e-mails he received from the US 4th Circuit judges in 2007, Dr Les Sachs finally e-mailed a response to these US judges which seemed to deter them from directly harassing him by e-mail any further. Sachs wrote back to the judges:

If one believed in the death penalty and hanging, then Judge Moon would certainly deserve to be sentenced by a court to hang on a gallows with Judge Payne, their bodies swinging outside the courthouse from nooses, as an example to other corrupt judges. But I do not believe in the death penalty, which your corrupt US judges take such perverted pleasure in imposing on innocent blacks and Hispanics and other minorities.

But Judge Moon certainly does deserve to be in prison for the rest of his life for conducting this fake trial and taking part in these terrorist criminal acts against me.

You courthouse staff who are harassing me with these e-mails, you be sure and tell Judge Moon and Judge Payne and Judge Hudson, and whatever other federal judges are all involved in these acts of terrorism in support of the Patricia Cornwell bribery and campaign money -

Judge Moon and all you other gangsters, take all your court papers and illegal court orders, you just shove all your court papers and illegal "court orders" each right up your criminal rectum. I don't read these dozens of e-mails you criminal gangsters are sending me, and it is up the rectum of Judge Moon and his fellow judges where these e-mails of yours belong.

Clearly the refugee journalist Dr Les Sachs, even under threat of death, still has some wit about him.


(10) The 2007 in absentia trial against Sachs, to block his websites and to enable the completion of his murder, was held by the same 4th Circuit US federal judges who are named in a standing Appeal by Sachs as legal parties to the ongoing case.

This Appeal was originally filed and dated 3 April 2004, and was re-filed both with the full panel of US federal 4th Circuit Appeals judges, as well as with the appropriate panel of the US Supreme Court, all of whom have refused to respond to Sachs' 125-count catalogue of criminal acts involving the 4th Circuit judges themselves, as well as Patricia Cornwell, her lawyers, and other parties in the attacks on Sachs.

This standing, and still unanswered Appealm is posted online in full. It is fraudulent and illegal for the same judges to hold a 'trial' in a case in which they are named as a party. The full text of this standing US Supreme Court and Appeals Court filing can be found here:

 http://mytinyurl.net/ccf8ce


(11) Dr Les Sachs had already published extensive journalism about corruption by both US 4th Circuit district and Appeals judges, and how these judges are involved in threatening to murder him.

The journalism of Dr Les Sachs involved not only the wrongdoing of the lower-level US Federal Judge Robert Payne who supervised the first of the fraudulent 'legal proceedings' against Sachs. It also involved journalism about the 4th Circuit higher-level Appeals judges generally, and above all, an important article about the most powerful senior judge on the entire Appeals panel, Judge J Harvie Wilkinson III.

Just as Wilkinson was being interviewed by former US President George Bush, to be the next Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court - the highest judge in the entire United States - Dr Les Sachs published an article about Wilkinson, "Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, His Bribery Cover-Up for 4th Circuit Judges". Apparently as a result of this article, and the scandal that would result if Wilkinson were to face confirmation hearings regarding elevation to the Supreme Court, Wilkinson was passed over for the job, and President Bush instead chose Chief Justice John G Roberts, ironically enough a Harvard classmate of Dr Les Sachs himself.

(The article about Judge Wilkinson was ordered to be blocked from the internet search engines, by the US judges working under Wilkinson's supervision. You can still find the article via at www (point) banned-in-america (net). Note: Do not put this site as a direct web page link, as any web page listing it may be blocked from internet search results.)

All this means that these judges must not hold any proceedings about matters in which they are personally involved as objects of the journalism of Dr Les Sachs. They were obligated to have any new case involving Sachs transferred to another Circuit altogether.

Appeals Judge Wilkinson will likely bear deep personal hatred for Sachs for the rest of his life, due to Wilkinson missing the appointment to be a historic Chief Justice of the entire USA. Wilkinson is said to bear a personal wish and desire to want Sachs murdered, as well as banned from the internet.

Yet Wilkinson authorised the lower judges under him, to hold the entire 2007 'legal proceeding' against Sachs, to spread smears against Sachs and to order the blocking of Sachs' websites, despite the fact it was fraudulent for the judges to do so, in this case where the lower court judges would face revenge from Wilkinson if they did not do harm to Sachs in ways that satisfy Wilkinson's desire for revenge.


(12) With the clear documentation that the US judges and government are involved in politically-motivated threats to torture and murder the journalist Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, and to take his human rights away, it is clear that Sachs is a victim of crimes of 'terrorism' by the US government, by both the European and US definitions of terrorism.

The 2007 US federal 'legal proceeding' against Sachs, seeking to do further harm to Sachs by way of extending earlier criminal acts of terrorism, is thus a clear violation of international law.

Moreover, the US federal judges in 2007 violated international law and treaties regarding open access to the internet, by issuing illegal orders upon Google and the other major internet search engines which have US offices, instructing them to block the European journalism sites of Dr Les Sachs from readers around the world.

This is a direct criminal attack on the rights of European citizens and on Europe itself, with US judges directly seizing control of what political material Europeans are allowed to find and read when they search Google or other dominant search engines.

Thus, the US 2007 'legal proceeding' against Dr Les Sachs, ordering the blocking of his European websites from readers around the world, so that Sachs can be slandered and killed, and the world deprived of reading his political journalism, is thus an illegal and fraudulent proceeding, a criminal act in direct violation of international treaties both on the subject of terrorism and on open control of the internet.


For more background on the above:


Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les Sachs

 http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581 - also at:  http://mytinyurl.net/10e98


US Blocking Belgian Journalism Websites to Help Murder US Dissident in Brussels

 http://www.indymedia.be/en/node/31259 - also at:  http://mytinyurl.net/f35b4e


- Dan Hajidah

Abdan "Dan" Hajidah is a researcher who has supplied documented source material to journalists at leading news outlets in Europe. He spreads his time among several northern European countries, including the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Belgium.


- E-Mail: dh-news@europe.com Website: http://european-muslim.skyrock.com/
 

Lees meer over: anti-fascisme / racisme europa media vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten

aanvullingen
> indymedia.nl > zoek > archief > hulp > doe mee > publiceer nieuws > open nieuwslijn > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL werkt volgens een 'open posting' principe om zodoende de vrijheid van meningsuiting te bevorderen. De berichten (tekst, beelden, audio en video) die gepost zijn in de open nieuwslijn van Indymedia NL behoren toe aan de betreffende auteur. De meningen die naar voren komen in deze berichten worden niet zonder meer door de redactie van Indymedia NL gesteund. Ook is het niet altijd mogelijk voor Indymedia NL om de waarheid van de berichten te garanderen.