english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
STATE VS ENVIRONMENT. SECRET PLOT TO UNDERMIN
dementia - 09.11.2003 18:44

According to data from 30-year-old government records given lately in public a secret plot was formed back then by developed countries in an attempt to limit first UN’s project concerning environment and pollution control. Reason? Simply would damage their economic development…

Before revealing the above data any comment suggesting secret opposition of official governments to environmental projects would be presented as groundless accusations coming from extreme eco-activists. But is a fact…In 1971, a secret group of developed countries, known as the “Brussels Group” was formed in order to limit the effectiveness of UN’s first conference for the environment, held in 1972 in Stockholm, which had as result to set up the UN environmental program (UNEP).

Members of this unholy alliance included Britain, Germany, Italy, France, US and Belgium and first meeting took place one year before Stockholm conference in July 1971. According to the archives of the meeting, the Group would function as “an unofficial policy-making body to concert the views of the principal governments concerned…” also the Group would have to “remain informal and confidential”.

The goals

If a prehistory of the reasons leading to the Anti-glob movement creation was about to be written, the principal goals of Brussels Group could surely be contained in Chapter One. The group’s most important concern was that any UN’s environmental regulations would restrict free trade development and, as consequence, the raging economy of the developed countries. Main pursuit also was to stop UNEP from having a large budget. The sad think is that the documents revealed, mention the “made a real progress on this difficult problem” but without mentioning how.

The archives of one of the many meetings, in Geneva, Dec. 1971, gives a better clue how these governments intended to limit the gravity of the conference for the environment and any chance for action that could burden them. It is mentioned clearly as a goal the diplomatic jockeying in Stockholm, in order to “be less worried about making it a success for developing countries”

The documents revealed mention also specific goals of Britain, which were to “avoid a new and expensive international organization” (meaning UNEP), which “would not be welcome but is probably inevitable”. Also, British Govs were opposed to any international standards regulating environmental quality or polluting emissions that might force Britain in long-term expensive adjustments.

It couldn’t be ignored of course the main reason of Britain’s position was the measures that could be taken against the use of the supersonic airliner Concorde which would seriously damage the economics of the Anglo-French airline.

Its opinion for an international legislation of ecological conscience is clearly declared in the hidden archives where is said, “Universal guidelines…could cause moral pressure for compliance with philosophies of doubtful validity or benefit…”

30 years after

The revealing of this secret group’s action has explained the primal one-sided point of view of the very first conference for the environment. Though, Brussels Group despite of its efforts, not many of their goals were achieved and that is mostly due to other kind of pressure and less because of any eco-ethics on behalf of the member countries.

The meaning of all the above makes rather easier the comprehension of failures in conferences like the one in Rio or Kyoto and Sydney. Agreements and disagreements, change of route and secret bargains on environmental policy’s back. All these can be well grounded having in mind the governmental behavior of developed countries. It’s obvious that such facts demonstrate the real cruel functions of the state and its real sensitivity, ending where loss of profit begins and it could surely justify many actions and practices turning against indifference when facing the disaster. The one integrated with governmental stamps.

As something last. Environmentalism perhaps means a few to many and that’s rather because we are adjusted in every day in more and more tight conditions with the exchange of a narcotic-like, urban conformism. A terrible change is happening to the world. You can smell it in the air, you can see it on earth and water. We face perdition, slowly and continually. We can feel it day by day. Unfortunately now more than ever activation is needed. Individual and collective. Simple, there are not going to be many more 30 years after



- E-Mail: deladementia@yahoo.com Website: http://www.geocities.com/deladementia/
 

Read more about: natuur, dier en mens

supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.