english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
A Different Netherlands Social Forum
Peter Waterman - 08.04.2004 12:42

The original proposal for the NSF (viewed briefly at the launch in Utrecht, April 2)seemed to me to more or less reproduce previous editions, both in form and content. It didn't seem to me particularly Dutch...


A Different Netherlands Social Forum is possible!

Introduction

What I bring to the following propositions are:

1) experience at three forum events, largely as an individual participant-observer-reporter;

2) 15 years writing about and involvement with 'the new internationalisms' and 'solidarity communication and culture',

3) an even-longer-standing interest in trade-union and labour internationalism (not necessarily the same thing),

4) an attempt to develop a Liberation Marxism (liberating Marxism from the Marxists and, obviously, also from Marx),

5) on-site and online observation of SF preparations in Peru, the UK and, now, in the Netherlands,

6) such activities as those listed at the bottom of this note.

I put these propositions forward with some diffidence, but in the hope that they will provoke critical thinking and creative action around the NSF proposed for November 2004.

1. Each national SF should reinvent the SF model, combining national and international features.

The original proposal for the NSF (viewed briefly at the launch in Utrecht, April 2)seemed to me to more or less reproduce previous editions, both in form and content. It didn't seem to me particularly Dutch...

Perhaps this has changed under discussion. Perhaps it will.

But depending on existing celebrities (Walden Bello, Arundhati Roy, Susan George) suggests a lack of imagination and a lack of search for local resource people. The most original idea is the hypothetical invitation of Michael Moore, the outrageous US film-maker - who would certainly awaken more media interest than Walden and Susan. But there are plenty of other international writers and activists one could invite:
'Another Alternative Celebrity is Possible'.

Why the tried and trusted format of Panels, Seminars and Workshops? Mumbai played down the massive opening panels, and I understand that these were also dramatically under-attended. Why not turn the matter round, ending with the Plenaries? There is a fatal threat of 'panelisation' at the SFs: of 5-10 'authorities' on the platform, speaking to 10-1,000 and then finding, 'oh dear, sorry, we only have time for 5 people to make 3-minute statements'. Why not turn THIS around: start with the floor and let the panel respond. Maybe it will learn something...

2. Within the WSF the only power worth exercising is that of empowerment

Initiators, as with the WSF in Porto Alegre, have enormous power from their initiating role (and their hypothetical or real possibility of giving or raising funds). However - and as some of the Brazilian initiators themselves have discovered or reveal - success lies in the capacity to give power and initiative to others.

3. The necessity for transparency and accountability: talking the talk or walking the walk?

'Civil society', national or global, is very good at demanding T&A from corporations and governments, but, even though it may have reflected on these within NGOs and social movements, they are less good at demonstrating these within the SFs themselves. This has been a major and conflictive issue in the UK, in preparing for the next ESF.

4. The necessity for address (or e-dress) to class, ethnic, religious, sexual others

In the Dutch case, the major challenges will probably be to involve (also as organisers!), unionised and unemployed people, youth, migrants, women and refugees, and muslim communities (plural). Otherwise we may find ourselves talking to ourselves - nice middle-class people (of a possible variety of political and sexual options).

5. We need to surpass the organisational/place-bound limits of the Forum process.

The WSF has been surprisingly weak in its cultural/communicational expression. The cultural explosion at Mumbai has been critiqued as allowing expression to the marginalised in India, whilst failing to provide them voice. WSF has been surprisingly under-developed in its use of computer communication. Cultural expression should not be divorced from talk events.

6. Success of the NSF depends on critical awareness of previous forum events - including awareness of debates around such.

There is an abundance of good quality analyses and debates about such on the web. They need to be reflected on by the organisers and made available to participants.

7. Surpassing 'ongización' and 'vanguardismo' (sounds better in Spanish)

Latin American feminists identified the problem of the NGOisation in and of their movement maybe five years or more ago. Independent socialists discovered the problem of vanguardism in their movement...umm...just after the Russian Revolution? However, vanguardism (leadership by an enlightened elite) is endemic to all political parties - and not confined to them. And, as the process in Mumbai, Lima and London is suggesting, it is quite possible for left political parties, unions and progressive NGOs to have a better understanding of each other than of those at the possibly unorganised social base or margins.

8. Localisation of the Forum process to supplement its 'national', 'regional' and 'global' foci.

Might be considered less necessary in a homogenous country like NL. But it should also be easier. And one could thus surpass the inevitable limitations of a one-off big-city event.

9. The 'self-organised' part of the programme should be prioritised.

Follows from Point 1 above. The WSF has no name for the other part of the programme (revealing a certain embarrassment about what should surely be called the 'official', 'institutional', or whatever, part). However, the placing of this first, and centrally, rather than later (often in a suburb, at the end of the busline, or both), allows the possibility of moving toward some kind of synthesis. And getting away from the idea that the organisers, or Celebs, need to provide orientation.

10. Another set of themes is also possible (and necessary?).

I know the 'problem orientation' was intended to surpass all-encompassing-ideologies and to precisely develop specific critiques and alternatives. It was also intended to allow for or encourage 'women' or 'labour' to address themselves to social problems more generally. But are we really going to get anything new out of 'ecological sustainability', however crucial I personally consider this to be?

Can't we think of a set of themes that is 1) more specific to NL, and/or 2) more original?

I believe, for example, that a theme on 'Decent Work and/or Liberation of Time from Work?' would not only have more bite than 'social exclusion' (which suggests the solution to be 'social inclusion' within the existing wage-force, welfare provision, etc), but could bring the unionised and the 'atypical' or unemployed labour together, but also discuss the meaning of work in another possible world.

11. (Because Marx had 11Theses on Feuerbach), I propose a theme, seminar, workshop, on 'Life After Capitalism'.

This was the name of a 'parallel forum', sponsored at WSF3 by Michael Albert of the US website, ZNet  http://www.zmag.org/lacsite.htm. This was a rather pluralistic project (from mild social-democrats to flaming anarchists), intended to surpass the merely oppositional (nix-it) or reformist (fix-it) attitudes towards neo-liberal globalisation.

(The limitations in practice on this imaginative proposal were due to the chaotic organisation of WSF3, which pushed it to the geographical periphery, and then kept changing its meeting places! Significantly, much of it is still available in cyberspace).

In so far as such a theme problematises capitalism, and tries to bring together utopian thinking with popular self-activity, it could challenge what is likely to be the dominant NSF tendency (to either return to a - partly mythical - past, or to surpass neo-liberalism by some kind of global neo-keynesianism that does not question deeply-rooted capitalist structures and processes - which will continue regardless).

That's all folks!

Peter Waterman
 http://www.attac.nl/attac-nw/sf-nsf01.html
 http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/transparant.nsf


Website: http://www.antenna.nl/~waterman/
 
supplements
some supplements were deleted from this article, see policy
Pseudo-marxisme 
Redi Mokro - 08.04.2004 17:51

"Met de leer van Marx gebeurt nu hetzelfde als wat in de geschiedenis meer dan eens met de leerstellingen van revolutionaire denkers en leiders der geknechte klassen in hun strijd voor de bevrijding is gebeurd. De onderdrukkende
klassen betaalden de grote revolutionairen tijdens hun leven
met ononderbroken vervolgingen en ontvingen hun leer met de ruwste kwaadaardigheid, de woedendste haat en met een teugelloze leugen- en lastercampagne.

Na hun dood worden pogingen gedaan om hen in onschadelijke afgodsbeeldjes te veranderen,- hen als het ware heilig te verklaren en aan hun n a a m, tot "troost" en verdomming van de onderdrukte klassen, een zekere beroemdheid te verlenen, terwijl hun revolutionaire leer van haar
i n h o u d en van haar revolutionaire scherpte wordt ontdaan en tot een banaliteit gemaakt.

Bij een dergelijke "bewerking" van het marxisme ontmoeten elkaar thans de bourgeoisie en de opportunisten in de arbeidersbeweging. Zij vergeten, verdoezelen en verminken de revolutionaire kant van de leer,- haar revolutionaire geest".

Het NSF in wording verdiend alle steun, ook van marxisten maar niet van pseudo-marxisten in naam van het marxisme!

met revolutionaire groet,
Redi Mokro
lees eens iets meer over de Social Fora 
Raphael - 09.04.2004 11:42

Als reactie op het bovenstaande: de kern van het ESF is openheid en democratie. Dit betekent dat niemand anderen in woorden mag uitsluiten. Een structurele multiloog is het uitgangspunt, mits mensen de noodzaak van progressieve verandering in de wereld onderschrijven (zie Charter of Principles).

Ik snap de opmerking dat het NSF geen steun verdient van pseudomarxisten uit naam van het marxisme, dan ook niet zo goed. Wie bepaalt dat ? Marx ???

Voor wie geinteresseerd is in de achtegronden en analyses van de Social Fora, lees eens enkele artikelen uit het volgende boek (dat te vinden is op deze website):

Challenging Empires
 http://www.choike.org/nuevo_eng/informes/1557.html
NSF 
Redi Mokro - 09.04.2004 20:22

Waar ik bezwaar tegen maak is de volgende uitgangspostie van
Peter Waterman :
4) an attempt to develop a Liberation Marxism (liberating Marxism from the Marxists and, obviously, also from Marx),
en:
7. Surpassing 'ongización' and 'vanguardismo' (sounds better in Spanish

Hier staat duidelijk dat in n a a m van Marx het marxisme
voor de zoveelste keer gerevisioneerd wordt!
Wat voor een marxisme is dat, dan pseudo-marxisme?

Ik wil en kan niemand uitsluiten, maar als aanhanger van het marxisme wijs ik erop dat hier onterecht het marxisme
wordt opgevoerd,aangezien het bij punt 4 genoemde dat wel
wel die pretentie heeft.

Ik bedank Raphael voor zijn reactie, wetende dat dit geen
discussie-site is.

Indien gewenst ben ik gaarne bereid hier over verder te gaan. Zie  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linksnederlands/

supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.