| Parool | link - 05.07.2004 15:33
AMSTERDAM - Er werkte tenminste één Israëliër als ondervrager in een Iraakse gevangenis die door de Amerikanen werd gecontroleerd. Dat zegt de Amerikaanse brigade-generaal Janis Karpinski. Het is de tweede keer dat gewag wordt gemaakt van Israëliërs in Irak.
zo begint het verhaal op de website van het parool
 Website: http://www.parool.nl/nieuws/2004/JUL/05/buit1.html
| | Kill all the Jews! | nessie - 07.07.2004 03:55
(1.) My name isn’t nessie.
(2.) But that has nothing to do with whether I can prove it. I can’t prove it. So what? That, doesn’t mean it’s not true. Personally, I don’t care whether you believe me or not. If you don’t believe me, then you’re not who I’m talking to. I’m talking people smart enough to know that when something that is inconsistent with the bulk of my writing comes signed with my name, it’s a forgery. Anybody who’s not smart enough to grasp that, wouldn’t understand what I was saying, anyway.
(3.) Besides, who it was that wrote something is irrelevant. Only content counts. If it’s true, it doesn’t matter who says it, or why. The truth is the truth, period.
(4.) Later, when you encounter something with my name on it, posted somewhere else on the internet, consider that it may be a forgery. If it is consistent with what you know I have actually written, then I wrote it. If it is not consistent, then it’s a forgery. If you can’t tell the difference, you’re too stupid to understand what I’m saying, anyway, so don’t waste time trying.
 E-Mail: nessie@sfbg.com | | nu.nl | L.H. Oswald - 07.07.2004 09:43
Een Australische terreurverdachte die al twee jaar vastzit op de Amerikaanse basis Guantanamo Bay, is door de Verenigde Staten een halfjaar lang voor ondervraging vastgehouden in Egypte. De 48-jarige Mahdouh Habib werd daar zo erg gemarteld dat hij er bijna aan overleed.
| | Mazen Dana werd herkend door israeliers | DE PAUS - 07.07.2004 10:10
Mazen dana is op 18 augustus door israeliers herkend , op behoorlijke afstand, toen hij voor abu graib aan het filmen was in zijn functie als camaraman voor reuetrs en in koele bloede afgeslacht op klaarlichte dag.
Ik zei het meteen.
Mazen Dana: In his Own Words
Monday, August 18th, 2003
CPJ
[AIC's note: Mazen Dana, a veteran Palestinian television cameraman for Reuters was shot dead in Baghdad on Sunday, August 18, while filming outside the city's Abu Ghraib prison.]
 http://www4.alternativenews.org/display.php?id=3323
| | pathological liar nessie | truthteller - 23.05.2005 01:40
These are the *exact* words from the truly deeply disturbed mind of nessie, gathered from the various IMC's that he spams, and *not one single word* has been changed.
----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
Those who are new around here should be aware that certain people have been forging my name to posts I didn’t write, in a pathetic attempt to discredit me. This is called “black propaganda,” and has a long, rich history.
See:
http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/07/138397_comment.php#138482
The way to tell if I actually wrote something is simple. If it sounds like something I wouldn’t say, it wasn’t.
To see what I really say, click here:
http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/
http://www.transbay.net/~nessie/
http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/09/149993_comment.php#150095
(snip)
(1.) My name isn’t nessie.
(2.) But that has nothing to do with whether I can prove it. I can’t prove it. So what? That, doesn’t mean it’s not true. Personally, I don’t care whether you believe me or not. If you don’t believe me, then you’re not who I’m talking to. I’m talking people smart enough to know that when something that is inconsistent with the bulk of my writing comes signed with my name, it’s a forgery. Anybody who’s not smart enough to grasp that, wouldn’t understand what I was saying, anyway.
(3.) Besides, who it was that wrote something is irrelevant. Only content counts. If it’s true, it doesn’t matter who says it, or why. The truth is the truth, period.
(4.) Later, when you encounter something with my name on it, posted somewhere else on the internet, consider that it may be a forgery. If it is consistent with what you know I have actually written, then I wrote it. If it is not consistent, then it’s a forgery. If you can’t tell the difference, you’re too stupid to understand what I’m saying, anyway, so don’t waste time trying.
(snip)
It's not about the writing. It's about the name.
(snip)
But remember, if only the content counts, and if it's true, and if it doesn't matter who says it or why, then is it really a forgery? Educate yourself. Start today.
(snip)
My signature can only be trusted here:
http://sf.indymedia.org/
here:
http://www.transbay.net/~nessie/
and most of here:
http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/
(snip)
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/1671143_comment.php
"how do we know 'one opinion' or anyone else . . . is who they say they are"
by nessie Saturday January 10, 2004 at 10:43 AM
You don't. Therefore, people should be judged on the basis of their actions, not their word. Talk’s cheap. Only actions count.
| |
