english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
German nuclear waste disposal disputes
Diet Simon - 23.04.2005 19:49

Activists are marking the 10th anniversary of resistance to nuclear waste being carted to Gorleben, a village in northern Germany. – A high-temperature thorium reactor in Hamm shut down in 1989 is costing five million euros a year. – The government majority in the German parliament has rejected a move by the conservative opposition to start using a leaking, abandoned iron ore mine in Salzgitter, north Germany, as a final nuclear dump.

German nuclear power stations
German nuclear power stations

Press release 22 April 05

Gorleben: 10 years of Castor transports
Last nuclear waste transport to plutonium factory

It’s been 10 years since the first convoy carrying highly radioactive waste rolled into Gorleben in Lower Saxony. For the activist group Bürgerinitiative Umweltschutz Lüchow Dannenberg (BI), which is preparing an artistic function to commemorate the 19th anniversary of Chernobyl, it was a “raven-black day” day after 13 years of successful prevention of storage through the courts.

On 25 April 1995, a day before the ninth anniversary of the Chernobyl reactor meltdown, the transports rolled through the front gate to the interim storage hall at 5.12 p.m.. Earlier, police and paramilitary border guards used water cannon, helicopters and dog squads to move thousands of people out of the way; they had used lots of imagination to try to stop the convoy. The people in the Wendland region have had to suffer the nine largest police deployments in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Yet the disposal quandary remains unsolved. Instead, the deadly radioactive waste lands in an interim storage hall with the safety standard of a potato barn. The nuclear industry operators of the above-ground hall refer to it as merely a protection against the weather. Despite this, more Castor transports are to roll, thereby manifesting as the site of final storage the Gorleben underground salt deposit that has been in dispute for 28 years.

A spokesman of the BI accuses: "Our constitutionally guaranteed rights to physical integrity [Every person shall have the right to life and physical integrity], freedom to demonstrate [All Germans shall have the right to assemble peacefully and unarmed without prior notification or permission.] and informational self-determination are invalidated by the deployment of gigantic police contingents for the financial interests of the nuclear industry. Demonstration ban zones more than 70 kilometres long between Lüneburg and Dannenberg further cement this intolerable condition that flies in the face of a democratically constituted society.”

The BI has information that on Tuesday evening (26 April), the Chernobyl anniversary, the last Castor transport is to leave the shut down nuclear station at Stade for the French plutonium factory at La Hague for recycling. There will be a demonstration at 6 p.m. at the Harburg Rathaus S-Bahn rail station and a warning vigil at 8 p.m. at Bahnhof Buchholz, as well as other protests against nuclear waste transportation to France. "The recycling heavily pollutes the environment through chimney and ocean discharges,” charges a BI spokesman. " As it is processed in the plutonium factory, the German nuclear waste delivered will for years to come radioactively pollute the north of Normandy.”

The Gorleben BI also sees an explosive legal situation after transportation to the plutonium factories stops. Legislation on the operation of nuclear power stations has so far demanded proof of waste disposal either by dangerous recycling or the so-called “direct final storage”.

But there is no final storage facility into which waste could be stored directly. The BI slams as scandalous that apparently the risky storage in light-construction halls is now to be declared as direct final storage. "There is no safe final storage for highly radioactive waste anywhere in the world although nuclear waste has been produced for 60 years. Carting it into radiating ‘potato barns’ cannot seriously be claimed as proof of disposal,” the BI spokesman argues.

Francis Althoff, phone #49 (0)5843 986789



Expensive standstill

Maintenance operation of the shut down Hamm-Uentrop nuclear power station costs five million euros a year. Local activists will hold a warning vigil on the Chernobyl anniversary.
HAMM · Tuesday is the 19th anniversary of the Chernobyl reactor disaster. The Hamm Citizens Initiative for Environmental protection (Bürgerinitiative Umweltschutz Hamm) is marking the occasion to hold a warning vigil at 5 p.m. that day in front of the shut down nuclear reactor at Uentrop. The thorium-high temperature reactor 300 (THTR) was shut down in 1989, no power has come from the plant since 1997. Yet the reactor is still causing costs. In a letter to the Bürgerinitiative the finance ministry of North-Rhine Westphalia state puts the "costs of maintenance operation of the secure lock-in” at about 5.1 million euros a year (nearly 14,000 euros a day).
In addition to the operation of the lock-in, the sum covers the cost of storing fuel and advance payments for a final solution (demolition).
"Going by old state budgets we had assumed annual costs of 3.034 million euros for the so-called maintenance operation. These figures have to be revised clearly upwards,” Horst Blume comments on the figure given by the ministry. Blume has headed the activist group for 30 years. On Tuesday he will report on “HTR export from Germany to everywhere in the world” at 7 p.m. in the Fuge-Laden on Widumstrasse.
Under a contract valid until 2009, the federation and the state share the costs. The so-called final storage advance payments – which the ministry put at 500 000 euros for 2003 – are split equally between the federation, the state and the company responsible for the construction and maintenance of the secure lock-in of the THTR 300, Hochtemperatur-Kernkraftwerk GmbH (HKG).
Blume also received an answer to his question how much the reactor has cost since the decision to close it down in September 1989 to the end of last year: 391.8 million euros. These are split into federation 112.1 million, state 131.0 millions and the equity holders of the HGK 148.7 million. "Funding for the phase following 2009 will be agreed in good time between the federation, state and HKG,” says the letter from the ministry. The federation and the state had a "great interest in the equity owners of the HKG and the electricity industry carrying the highest possible share of the costs generated in future by the shut down THTR," the letter says.
The "secure lock-in" in Uentrop is licensed until 2027. The North-Rhine Westphalian ministry for transport, energy and planning wrote in another letter that by 2030 “according to several statements by the federation” there is to be a final storage facility in Germany. Until then the shut down reactor will remain the way it is. The energy ministry told the activists that it sees “no need for any decision in the foreseeable by the state government about continuation of the licensed secure lock-in or the further dissembly of the THTR plant, for which an available final storage would be an efficient measure.”


No fast-track expansion of former iron mine

BERLIN. The dispute about plans to turn Schacht Konrad, a former iron ore mine near Salzgitter, into a final storage for nuclear waste, is sharpening. The conservative CDU-CSU opposition parties failed with a parliamentary motion to start storage as soon as possible, the Greens accused the Lower Saxony state government of refusing a final storage solution.

Greens deputy Marianne Tritz said in the Bundestag that Lower Saxony was making a lot of noise about Schacht Konrad, but didn’t follow up its words with deeds. Although litigation papers against the planning procedure for Konrad had been filed a year and a half ago, there had been no response yet from the state government. "Anyone refusing a solution of the final storage problem like this should be careful about accusing others of procrastination,” said Tritz.

The CDU/CSU had initiated the debate. It accused the federal government of procrastination in the nuclear disposal policy and demanded a change of course. Instead of the current single-storage strategy – which would rule out Schacht Konrad – two final storages should again be planned, they demanded. To that end, the exploration of the Gorleben salt deposit should resume. Schacht Konrad should be expanded without further delay to take in medium and low radioactive wastes, as soon as a first-instance court judgement was passed in the cuirrent cases.

The CDU energy expert, Kurt-Dieter Grill, said "The disposal policy of the government is expensive, senseless, wrong and offloads the responsibility on coming generations.” The government parties rejected the motion and declared that it would stay with the single-storage concept. It again kept open the time schedule for further procedures.

Wilhelm Schmidt, Social Democrat deputy from Salzgitter, said, “Resistance against Schacht Konrad will continue.” One of the issues, he said, was location interests of the region. Schmidt also demanded a serious danger analysis for the former salt mine Asse II near Wolfenbüttel. There needed to be a check, he said, whether the 1,300 containing medium radioactive waste could stay in the former mine.

Anti-nuclear activists allege that for years eleven cubic metres of brine have been seeping into the Asse II pit every day, endangering the barrels. If the radioactive waste comes into contact with water or the brine, the barrels would rust, they argue, allowing radioactivity to enter the ground water.

 

Read more about: natuur, dier en mens

supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.