english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
What can lightning do to a nuke?
Diet Simon - 10.08.2006 04:16

Can a lighting strike or a short-circuit put the safety systems of nuclear power stations out of action? That’s one of the things the German environment minister, whose portfolio includes nuclear safety, wants examined at German nukes. Sigmar Gabriel, a Social Democrat, has been prompted by the switchoff of several Swedish nukes to demand a check on German ones. A recent disturbance at the Forsmark station in Sweden was claimed by some insiders to have got close to a Chernobyl-type disaster.

Gabriel is demanding safety checks at German nukes following his ministry’s inquiries with authorities in the federal states, which are the nuclear supervisors.
"By what’s known so far, the Forsmark disturbance cannot be transferred one to one and we don’t have to shut down any reactors here,” said Gabriel, “but it does raise issues that we have to clarify carefully.”
The Gabriel ministry says in a media release that in principle it has to be found out for German atomic power stations what would happen if electric overloads were carried into the plants from outside and what effects on the plants’ internal networks are possible. Plant documentation would have to be compared with their actual condition.
“The question is, can a short circuit or a lightning strike create a situation which makes the safety systems of the atomic power stations ineffective,” the release quotes Gabriel as saying.
The Swedish nuclear supervisory authorities say more investigations are needed there, especially as to how the instrumentation needed to run the reactor could fail. This was why, Gabriel is quoted as saying, all opinions on the transferability of the incident could only be provisional.
“I would have wished that the German operators of atomic power stations had responded somewhat more safety-consciously, rather than rush to market with mollifications,” Gabriel is quoted as saying.
The breakdown in Sweden, not caught by any previous safety analysis, shows that atomic power is so complex that such occurrences belong with the system-immanent risks of the technology, says the ministry statement. It continues: “It is not possible to examine beforehand all practically occurring possibilities, said the environment minister. ‘What we’re experiencing here, learning by doing, is normality in using atomic power. And that precisely is the problem of this form of energy,’ said Gabriel. This applied especially to older reactors. The federal environment minister therefore called on the operators of German atomic power stations to make use of the provision in the Atomic Energy Act to transfer remaining power production volumes from older to newer, more modern reactors. ‘That would contribute to safety in Germany,’ Gabriel said.”
The media release rejected the accusation by some federal states that the federal government had informed them too late. The release says on Thursday 3 August the first provisional analysis of the breakdown by the Swedish supervisors was available, which the Gabriel ministry had passed on with its initial assessment to the states the following morning. Before that only a report by the INES system of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had been available on the Internet. The states’ nuclear supervisors have their own access to the reporting system, the release argues, but notes that it provides no background information to its users.
A team of IAEA experts is to examine the system of government supervision of atomic installations in Germany next year, the ministry reports. “That has long been practice in other countries like France or Great Britain,” the minister is quoted as saying. In these check-ups the IAEA looks whether a country’s structure can be improved to international standards.
“As the federal government we want to submit to this check-up, but assume that it’s also in the interest of the federal states. This is certainly no subject for federal points-scoring,” Gabriel says in the release.
The release is available in German at  http://www.bmu.de/pressemitteilungen/pressemitteilungen_ab_22112005/pm/37578.php

 

Read more about: natuur, dier en mens

supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.