english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
FW: RED ALERT:CHICAGO 9/11 (Unclassified, M
Captain Eric. H. May - 08.09.2006 01:32


The Army has replied to the warnings of Ghost Troop that the Bush Administration is planning a 5th anniversary 9/11 attack, coded as 9/11-V. The trouble is, they acknowledge the danger and dodge their job of doing anything to protect the American People. Are we being set up for a new Pearl Harbor?


FW: RED ALERT:CHICAGO 9/11
(Unclassified, Mission 9/11-V)

Prologue from the Pentagon

SAIG-ASSISTU-IGNET Mailbox wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Captain May,

Perhaps you have the wrong agency. The Department of the Army is not
responsible for addressing criminal matters. I recommend you revaluate your
concerns and submit them to one of the agencies responsible for handling
issues of this magnitude. I am certain you know who they are. I am sorry
we could not be more helpful regarding your efforts.

ASSISTU
Attn: US Army Inspector General

Dear General Green,

Above you see the reply I received from the Department of the Army about
the red alert we have issued in the last week to Chicago, Detroit and
Houston. In it Army supports my charge that the Bush Administration is
preparing to stage another 9/11 around the 5th 9/11 (9/11-V) since the
original attack, and encourages me to report it. Having said so much,
though, Army says no more, and fails utterly to defend the American People.
To complete the proof of a conspiracy of silence, the Army has placed a
warning statement, written in red for emphasis, ordering that I am NOT to
spread the alert that it has just ordered me to spread:

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachments
may contain Inspector General sensitive information, which is protected from
mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 USC
§552. Matters within IG records are often predecisional in nature and do not
represent final approved DA policy. Dissemination is prohibited except as
authorized under Army Regulation 20-1. Do not release outside of DA channels
without prior authorization from The Inspector General. If you are not the
intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on this information is
prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by return e-mail.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

[Back to Army Inspector General...]
General Green, what's happening as a 9/11-V attack is being arranged is
quite like what happened before the Pearl Harbor attack. Then, as now, the
military command shut down, closed its eyes, and allowed the attack to
occur. For the full text of the Army reply from which I have extracted
above, please refer to:
 http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9175

NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/28/05

NASA's delay in launching the space shuttle Atlantis indicates a delay in
the 9/11-V attack. We have been involved in two Houston-area warnings of
petrochemical events that coincided with the only two shuttle launches in
the last two years. On 7/26/05, NASA launched Discovery, then on 7/28/05
British Petroleum, Texas City, blew up, sending oil prices (and profits) to
the highest levels in history before Katrina. This mission coincided with
the use of an air-burst nuclear weapon, or a similar weapon, being deployed
south of Houston, and is the content of the most listened-to of my
interviews as Ghost Troop Commander:
 http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/capt1.htm.

Teknosis created an ongoing article from our mission files that showed how
the shuttle mission was used to set up a Texas City attack, which would have
been the much-promised Al Qaeda nuke attack the media was setting up last
summer:  http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2005/week30/index.html. In
that article you'll find that we were suppressed by the FBI and Secret
Service as we tried to alert the American People, much as we are countered
by the Signal Corps now.

NASA Treason and New Horizons: 1/31/06

NASA's launch of the New Horizons Mission was heavily coded, with a 1/19
launch (9/11 backwards). It is a 9-year mission to the 9th planet, Pluto,
named after the Roman god of death:  http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/. After this
event we put Texas City under red alert again for another attempt at a
false-flag nuke by the Bush Administration, predicting the attempt would be
1/31/06 (1/31 is an anagram of the Madrid 3/11 attack code).

The result of our mission was another success -- and mainstream media
reported that secret Dept. of Defense nuclear assets were present in the
Texas City area. I conducted an interview after we confirmed the nuke
attempt, which contains links to the confirmation article in Galveston
County Daily News:
 http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/FEB_2%20BRIEFING.htm

NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/2/06

Ghost Troop figured that the next NASA launch of Discovery would also be
in concert with an attempt at an attack, and again we were right. The
original date for the launch was 7/1. The Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown,
like Texas City, a Houston petro-suburb exploded on 7/2, again resulting in
the highest oil prices in history when the markets reopened after the July
4th holiday. In a 6/29/06 interview, I was explicit about the danger ahead,
and my prediction was validated by the event:
 http://gmpodcasting.net/podcast/siw/index.php?id=66

We note that there is another NASA shuttle launch, Atlantis, set for
tomorrow, and believe that it will be used to signal, and possibly assist,
with the 9/11-V attack. This is high treason.

Coded Messages for 9/11-V Attack

In the last two weeks, there have been several coded stories that show the
Bush Administration is preparing for the 9/11-V attack

8/27: Flight 5191:
 http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1156697179.html
In this story, from the Sunday before last, an aviation disaster (staged)
was reported as a way of conveying code. The flight number says it all:
5191, which is the 5th 9/11, once you unscramble it (5/9/11). This was
immediately after both Bush 41 and Bush 43 met in Kennebunkport, and was the
"go code" for the 9/11-V attack.

9/3: Iraq War KIA = 9/11 WTC KIA (2749)
 http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/03/death.toll/
In this story, the Pentagon releases the numeric code number that is
identical to the 9/11 WTC death count of 2749. The body counts equal, a
freak occurrence. Please note the confirmation of the WTC body count via a
2005 article:
 http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/DDC36FFE-43A3-4E24-B7BC-D93F45B0ED24.htm
This was a Pentagon "go code" for the 9/11-V attack.

I note here for those who read the Al Qaeda code that the number 2749 has
a two-step increase of even numbers as the 1st and 3rd numbers: 2 ... 4;
and has a two-step increase of odd numbers as the 2nd and 4th numbers: ...
7 ... 9. This is code.

Signal Corps Treason and RTO Trainer

the pending 9/11-V attack. It has continued to the present, after a week of
constant harassment of our cyber-communications.

The Signal Corps magazine Signaleer, led by "RTO Trainer" is attempting to
undermine the very code analysis that the Army just recommended I report to
other agencies, and we thereby infer that the Signal Corps has the
responsibility for enabling the false-flag 9/11-V attack by attacking anyone
trying to impede the attack. This is the same code analysis I've just done
above on the code numbers of Flight 5191 and the Iraq War / 9/11 WTC body
count of 2749.

RTO Trainer has dedicated a week now to attacking our code analysis. Why
bother -- unless he's protecting the codes being used to set up the 9/11-V
attack?

He show knowledge of several code types, and uses codes in his own writing
intended to argue against our decoding. "RTO Trainer" itself is a code
name, an anagram for "ANTI-TERROR," when the letters are rearranged. Far
from working in an anti-terror capacity to stop harm from befalling the
American People, RTO Trainer is working in a pro-terror capacity to set up
the 9/11-V attack.

In order to make it clear that I thought this conduct treasonous, I sent a
warning to RTO Trainer and his Signal Corps superiors on 9/1/06, which is
also part of Ghost Troop archives:
 http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9037.

You'll find that the message quite specifically warns RTO Trainer, the
Signaleer and the Signal Corps that conducting a psyops mission against us
as we warned the American People of a coded terror event was treason. In an
effort to counterattack the psyops, our Ghost Troop correspondent, GT Kent,
has begun to publish articles describing what RTO Trainer and the Signaleer
are up to:
 http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/09/ghost-troop-and-treason-of-rto-trainer.html.

Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld and Treason

I request that you report my findings of a Bush Administration attempt to
stage the 9/11-V attack to the Joint Chiefs, and to all other echelons and
services. There could not be a greater danger to the American People than
that which we now face, with a 9/11 Conspiracy now falling apart as more and
more people ask questions and the 9/11 commissioners admit that they didn't
get straight answers in their investigation.

I have already written and published on the Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld decision,
stating that I believe it is a salutary attempt to uphold the constitution.
It says that neither the president nor his agents -- or officers in the
Armed Services -- are authorized to break the law, whether that means
torture in Gitmo or setting up false-flag attacks on the American People. I
request that you remind the Pentagon that it serves the Constitution, not
the 9/11 Conspiracy, and advise them to read my article explaining how I
believe the near future will judge present actions:

Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld: Geneva Conventions now; Nuremberg Principles later
 http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2006%20Opinion%20Editorials/July/3%20o/Hamdan%20vs%20Rumsfeld%20Geneva%20Conventions%20now,%20Nuremberg%20Principles%20later%20By%20Captain%20Eric%20H.%20May.htm

Respectfully,

Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action

FW: RED ALERT: CHICAGO 9/11
(Unclassified, Mission 9/11-V)

Prologue from the Pentagon

SAIG-ASSISTU-IGNET Mailbox wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Captain May,

Perhaps you have the wrong agency. The Department of the Army is not
responsible for addressing criminal matters. I recommend you revaluate your
concerns and submit them to one of the agencies responsible for handling
issues of this magnitude. I am certain you know who they are. I am sorry
we could not be more helpful regarding your efforts.

ASSISTU
Attn: US Army Inspector General

Dear General Green,

Above you see the reply I received from the Department of the Army about
the red alert we have issued in the last week to Chicago, Detroit and
Houston. In it Army supports my charge that the Bush Administration is
preparing to stage another 9/11 around the 5th 9/11 (9/11-V) since the
original attack, and encourages me to report it. Having said so much,
though, Army says no more, and fails utterly to defend the American People.
To complete the proof of a conspiracy of silence, the Army has placed a
warning statement, written in red for emphasis, ordering that I am NOT to
spread the alert that it has just ordered me to spread:

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachments
may contain Inspector General sensitive information, which is protected from
mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 USC
§552. Matters within IG records are often predecisional in nature and do not
represent final approved DA policy. Dissemination is prohibited except as
authorized under Army Regulation 20-1. Do not release outside of DA channels
without prior authorization from The Inspector General. If you are not the
intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on this information is
prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by return e-mail.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

[Back to Army Inspector General...]
General Green, what's happening as a 9/11-V attack is being arranged is
quite like what happened before the Pearl Harbor attack. Then, as now, the
military command shut down, closed its eyes, and allowed the attack to
occur. For the full text of the Army reply from which I have extracted
above, please refer to:
 http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9175

NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/28/05

NASA's delay in launching the space shuttle Atlantis indicates a delay in
the 9/11-V attack. We have been involved in two Houston-area warnings of
petrochemical events that coincided with the only two shuttle launches in
the last two years. On 7/26/05, NASA launched Discovery, then on 7/28/05
British Petroleum, Texas City, blew up, sending oil prices (and profits) to
the highest levels in history before Katrina. This mission coincided with
the use of an air-burst nuclear weapon, or a similar weapon, being deployed
south of Houston, and is the content of the most listened-to of my
interviews as Ghost Troop Commander:
 http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/capt1.htm.

Teknosis created an ongoing article from our mission files that showed how
the shuttle mission was used to set up a Texas City attack, which would have
been the much-promised Al Qaeda nuke attack the media was setting up last
summer:  http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2005/week30/index.html. In
that article you'll find that we were suppressed by the FBI and Secret
Service as we tried to alert the American People, much as we are countered
by the Signal Corps now.

NASA Treason and New Horizons: 1/31/06

NASA's launch of the New Horizons Mission was heavily coded, with a 1/19
launch (9/11 backwards). It is a 9-year mission to the 9th planet, Pluto,
named after the Roman god of death:  http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/. After this
event we put Texas City under red alert again for another attempt at a
false-flag nuke by the Bush Administration, predicting the attempt would be
1/31/06 (1/31 is an anagram of the Madrid 3/11 attack code).

The result of our mission was another success -- and mainstream media
reported that secret Dept. of Defense nuclear assets were present in the
Texas City area. I conducted an interview after we confirmed the nuke
attempt, which contains links to the confirmation article in Galveston
County Daily News:
 http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/FEB_2%20BRIEFING.htm

NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/2/06

Ghost Troop figured that the next NASA launch of Discovery would also be
in concert with an attempt at an attack, and again we were right. The
original date for the launch was 7/1. The Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown,
like Texas City, a Houston petro-suburb exploded on 7/2, again resulting in
the highest oil prices in history when the markets reopened after the July
4th holiday. In a 6/29/06 interview, I was explicit about the danger ahead,
and my prediction was validated by the event:
 http://gmpodcasting.net/podcast/siw/index.php?id=66

We note that there is another NASA shuttle launch, Atlantis, set for
tomorrow, and believe that it will be used to signal, and possibly assist,
with the 9/11-V attack. This is high treason.

Coded Messages for 9/11-V Attack

In the last two weeks, there have been several coded stories that show the
Bush Administration is preparing for the 9/11-V attack

8/27: Flight 5191:
 http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1156697179.html
In this story, from the Sunday before last, an aviation disaster (staged)
was reported as a way of conveying code. The flight number says it all:
5191, which is the 5th 9/11, once you unscramble it (5/9/11). This was
immediately after both Bush 41 and Bush 43 met in Kennebunkport, and was the
"go code" for the 9/11-V attack.

9/3: Iraq War KIA = 9/11 WTC KIA (2749)
 http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/03/death.toll/
In this story, the Pentagon releases the numeric code number that is
identical to the 9/11 WTC death count of 2749. The body counts equal, a
freak occurrence. Please note the confirmation of the WTC body count via a
2005 article:
 http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/DDC36FFE-43A3-4E24-B7BC-D93F45B0ED24.htm
This was a Pentagon "go code" for the 9/11-V attack.

I note here for those who read the Al Qaeda code that the number 2749 has
a two-step increase of even numbers as the 1st and 3rd numbers: 2 ... 4;
and has a two-step increase of odd numbers as the 2nd and 4th numbers: ...
7 ... 9. This is code.

Signal Corps Treason and RTO Trainer

the pending 9/11-V attack. It has continued to the present, after a week of
constant harassment of our cyber-communications.

The Signal Corps magazine Signaleer, led by "RTO Trainer" is attempting to
undermine the very code analysis that the Army just recommended I report to
other agencies, and we thereby infer that the Signal Corps has the
responsibility for enabling the false-flag 9/11-V attack by attacking anyone
trying to impede the attack. This is the same code analysis I've just done
above on the code numbers of Flight 5191 and the Iraq War / 9/11 WTC body
count of 2749.

RTO Trainer has dedicated a week now to attacking our code analysis. Why
bother -- unless he's protecting the codes being used to set up the 9/11-V
attack?

He show knowledge of several code types, and uses codes in his own writing
intended to argue against our decoding. "RTO Trainer" itself is a code
name, an anagram for "ANTI-TERROR," when the letters are rearranged. Far
from working in an anti-terror capacity to stop harm from befalling the
American People, RTO Trainer is working in a pro-terror capacity to set up
the 9/11-V attack.

In order to make it clear that I thought this conduct treasonous, I sent a
warning to RTO Trainer and his Signal Corps superiors on 9/1/06, which is
also part of Ghost Troop archives:
 http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9037.

You'll find that the message quite specifically warns RTO Trainer, the
Signaleer and the Signal Corps that conducting a psyops mission against us
as we warned the American People of a coded terror event was treason. In an
effort to counterattack the psyops, our Ghost Troop correspondent, GT Kent,
has begun to publish articles describing what RTO Trainer and the Signaleer
are up to:
 http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/09/ghost-troop-and-treason-of-rto-trainer.html.

Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld and Treason

I request that you report my findings of a Bush Administration attempt to
stage the 9/11-V attack to the Joint Chiefs, and to all other echelons and
services. There could not be a greater danger to the American People than
that which we now face, with a 9/11 Conspiracy now falling apart as more and
more people ask questions and the 9/11 commissioners admit that they didn't
get straight answers in their investigation.

I have already written and published on the Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld decision,
stating that I believe it is a salutary attempt to uphold the constitution.
It says that neither the president nor his agents -- or officers in the
Armed Services -- are authorized to break the law, whether that means
torture in Gitmo or setting up false-flag attacks on the American People. I
request that you remind the Pentagon that it serves the Constitution, not
the 9/11 Conspiracy, and advise them to read my article explaining how I
believe the near future will judge present actions:

Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld: Geneva Conventions now; Nuremberg Principles later
 http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2006%20Opinion%20Editorials/July/3%20o/Hamdan%20vs%20Rumsfeld%20Geneva%20Conventions%20now,%20Nuremberg%20Principles%20later%20By%20Captain%20Eric%20H.%20May.htm

Respectfully,

Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action


Captain Eric H. May
Houston, Texas
 captainmay@prodigy.net
www.ghosttroop.net

- E-Mail: captainmay@prodigy.net Website: http://www.ghosttroop.net
 

Read more about: globalisering media militarisme

supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.