english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
Gorleben fears becoming Europe's nuclear dump
Diet Simon - 26.03.2007 09:03

People who have fought for 30 years against nuclear waste dumping at the north German village of Gorleben now fear that the salt deposit there will become an international final repository.

If the exploratory salt mine in Gorleben, now temporarily stopped over safety concerns, were to start operating as a repository, “it would be an international repository because of substitution treaties already in place”.


Exploratory salt mine and storage hall at Gorleben.
Exploratory salt mine and storage hall at Gorleben.

So claims Francis Althoff, press spokesman of the umbrella group of Gorleben anti-nuclear activists, Bürgerinitiative Umweltschutz Lüchow
Dannenberg in a media release following a protest visit to Brussels ( http://germany.indymedia.org/2007/03/171772.shtml).

Geologists and other experts have long said that the salt deposit near the River Elbe is unsuitable because it has contact with ground water and aquifers, and drinking supplies could be contaminated in a radius of hundreds of kilometres.

The local opponents argue that with every shipment of more waste to the Gorleben concrete hall right next to the salt mine, the likelihood grows of the salt becoming the final repository, as favoured by industry which leans heavily on the conservative politicians leading the coalition government with Social Democrats.

About 200 demonstrators against nuclear energy on Friday delivered 630,000 signatures to the European Commission to protest against the use of nuclear energy in Europe and against the Euratom treaty that was signed in Rome 50 years ago.

The European Union will spend 2,751 million euros on nuclear activities in its research funding from this year until 2013 although at least two member countries, Germany and Sweden, have pledged to drop nuclear power production and another, Austria, has banned it, and although a majority of people in the 27 member countries oppose nuclear power.

Althoff writes in his release that more highly radioactive waste is to be transported from the processing plant at Sellafield in northern England to the Gorleben interim storage hall than Germany originally sent there in the form of spent fuel rods.

A six-member Gorleben delegation took part in Brussels in a two-day hearing in the EU Parliament marking the 50th anniversary of the EURATOM treaty and protests at the symbolic Atomium building.

The EURATOM treaty forces even EU countries without nuclear power stations to contribute money to promoting the use of nuclear power generation and there was even talk of making it part of the EU constitution, says Althoff.

At the invitation of the non-partisan Member of the European Parliament, Tobias Pflüger, Althoff addressed a hearing in the house on the EU’s final repository plans.

He said there have long been multinational repositories in the EU. “If Gorleben were to start operating it would be an international repository because of substitution treaties already in place.”

”In this case the term substitution simply stands for a multinational atomic waste deal,” Althoff writes. “It is agreed, for example, that more highly radioactive waste is to be transported from the processing plant at Sellafield in northern England to the Gorleben interim storage hall than Germany originally sent there in the form of spent fuel rods.

“The deal is that in return the low level and medium level radioactive waste is to be shallowly buried under catastrophic conditions in the Drigg final repository near Sellafield.

“Similar contracts have been prepared with the plutonium factory at La Hague in northern France.”

The spokesman of the Gorleben activists hopes to find out with a letter to the German environment minister, Sigmar Gabriel, from which countries the additional highly active waste for Gorleben originates.

He’s also invited the minister again to visit the Gorleben area and address people’s concerns there. Gabriel declined a previous invitation citing prior commitments.

In his Brussels address Althoff also referred to other preparations for multinational final repositories for the EU.

For example, a research project launched by the EU, titled SAPIERR (for Support Action Pilot Initiative for European Regional Repositories) has been working since 2004 on a scenario for asserting a multinational atomic waste dump.

Funded mainly from the Sixth EU Framework Programme for Research and Development, which will be followed by a seventh this year, SAPIERR calculates the present and future stock of nuclear waste and investigates legal frame conditions for a joint multinational final repository location.

“One of the favoured locations is already Russia,” Althoff reports. “Already in 2001 the Russian parliament made a law to allow the import of highly radioactive spent fuel rods.

“In 2003, for example, the uranium mines and uranium processing location Krasnokamensk, 7,000 km east of Moscow were suggested as an international final repository for highly radioactive atomic waste,” Althoff notes.

For the catastrophic conditions under which waste from Germany and other countries is disposed in Siberia, see  http://de.indymedia.org/2007/02/167406.shtml and (in German)  http://germany.indymedia.org/2007/03/170971.shtml.

Althoff writes that in addition to Gorleben other EU locations are “randomly” being considered. “At the start of this decade the EU declared that its member states should move forward faster with their waste disposal programmes.

“It was posited at the same time that in this sector initially the only way forward for small countries is cooperation,” Althoff continues.

Accordingly it had formulated its suggestion for a EURATOM directive of the European Council (the top decision-making body in the bloc) on the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive wastes.

In article 4 of the draft of the directive it initially kept open for member states with a small volume of waste the possibility of importing or exporting radioactive wastes for environmental, security or economic reasons, under adherence to Directive 92/3 EURATOM.

The European Parliament had already earlier passed a resolution on the same subject.

“Interestingly,” notes Althoff, “later the most likely reasons, namely the purely economic aspect, are no longer mentioned. Instead is inserted that to a not inconsiderable part the interest had to be ascribed to the growing ‘concern about terrorist threats’.”

On the legal frame conditions necessary for multinational final repositories the Gorleben spokesman noted in the Brussels hearing:

“Importation of radioactive materials is allowed in many EU countries, especially those with atomic reactors. With the exception of Finland, exportation is legal in all EU states.

“There are no legal hindrances, either, in regard to permissions for atomic waste to transit through countries that might be affected by transports through their territory to and from a multinational repository in a neighbouring country.

“When governing politicians speak of a ‘national task’ in the final storage of nuclear waste, according to the present status of the substitution treaties and the possible consequences of the SAPIERR project it is worse than sleazy,” the Gorleben spokesman commments.

“There is no safe final storage. Instead of pumping millions into what have been proved to be unsuitable sites like Gorleben in Germany or Bure in France, the nuclear exit is overdue,” Althoff said.

On the day after the hearing the Gorleben delegation took part with a banner saying "Stop EURATOM, No Nuclear Constitution" in colourful protests near the Brussels landmark, the Atomium, a building in the shape of an atom.

Together with the international protest delegation they then took part in the handing over of the signatures.

See also  http://germany.indymedia.org/2007/03/171772.shtml, Protest against EU's doubling atomic spending: The European Union will spend 2,751 million euros on nuclear activities in its research funding from this year until 2013 although at least two member countries, Germany and Sweden, have pledged to drop nuclear power production and another, Austria, has banned it.

Other reports on the Brussels action at  http://www.eux.tv/article.aspx?articleId=5248 and  http://www.eux.tv/article.aspx?articleId=5248


The people to contact:
Bürgerinitiative Umweltschutz Lüchow Dannenberg
Postal and physical address: Drawehner Str. 3, 29439 Lüchow, Germany
Tel: #49 5841-4684 Fax: 3197
Press spokesman: Francis Althoff 05843 986789
 bi-presse@t-online.de
www.bi-luechow-dannenberg.de




- E-Mail: bi-presse@t-online.de Website: http://www.bi-luechow-dannenberg.de
 

Read more about: europa globalisering natuur, dier en mens vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten

supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.